the greatest media event of 2007

який дбайливий вбивця - записав усе на пльонку і розіслав для прийдешніх поколінь, шоб ніхто не мучився з розслідуванням і висновками. хаха!

the guy is a […]

nice fresh chunk for peter to chew.

peter got a brand new book out there. limited to 112 copies.

yeah, this one is a fresh chunk. a media-self-consumed piece of art

weird, why the number of victims is only 33, instead of 112. the rest will catch up?

33 is too high. no way to create images of personalitys and meditate on them for the rest of your life. this is not like moors murders.
more like a computer game.
what counts is a personality of cho seung-hui

i'm not mourning them. neither am i infatuated with cho. it's all just a piece of entertainment.
a computer game, you got it. the rest will catch up.

---> the rest will catch up.

thats it. the media will overrol everybody.
just trying to understand the whole thing from peters point of view.

have you ever asked yourself, why peter is so much concerned with all that crap?

peter is a kind of american white trash, who understands the crap and enjoys it even more, cause he knows how it all work.
he is: http://www.7inchpunk.com/sounds/victims/01-victims-television%20addict.mp3
reading peter is for me constantly asking myself "why is he so concerned whith that crap?". but more important - "why am i reading this stuff?". and thats the point. this texts are adressing the reader much more than everything i had read before and will read afterwards. it is all about questioning yourself.
if peter would not exist, you had to invent him.

You don't have permission to access /sounds/victims/01-victims-television addict.mp3 on this server.

so you think he's interested in pathologies, 'cause he knows it? not because he experienced it and had to overcome one? just loving shit, tired with boredom?
you're reading him, as he's nicely in it. he's addressing noone for purpose, just playing tricks.
aren't idolizing him? he's worth it, though.

peter is surely not the abused one. but not the abuser. just a bored man who likes to fantasize. sitting home and watching tv, reading newspapers you get more perverted, than if you run in the street with a rifle. cause thats the real pornography. fulfilling the desires is breaking the rules. the most perverts do this, when they completely lost the touch with reality. but the smart ones enjoy porno as long as they can. and the smart ones can do it very long, cruising around some themes. its amazing, cause all the subjects and all the fetishes are really trivial and simple. but the vicked mind can turn everything into something special.
and thats what peter is all about.

i use the therm "pornography" describing a very big territory of the media, not only "fucking + camera"-thing

you can't imagine him being abused or commit sth like that, eh? i can. but it still doesn't make sense, unless i don't know exactly.
the person who's only bored with the news, can't be so piercingly cynical, so intellectually brutal for no personal reason. he must have some skeletons in his cupboard, i suspect. i agree that it's the matter of mind, but i still believe that a man becomes cynic due to the wickedness, which has happened to him one day. a smart ones get to know how to laugh at it, whereas the weak ones get broken. peter is a smart one.

i understand. pornography as a hardcore exaggeration dots the deepest i's and crosses the never existing t's, and peter sotos is a pornographer for his sadistic boldness. but he must the one who shares somehow the internal meaning of suffering with his characters.

haha, you mentioned the name. so, kids - use-google-before-you-think. too many information on the internet. but - try.

de sade was also not always the abuser. just sometimes. all the horrible perversions he described, well… he could try them only in his head. the blank paper is sometimes the best thing to rape.

not only bored with tv, just bored with everything. being a pervert is also boring. look at de sade. being a pervert is having your own rules and limits. and the media is the main source where peter gets his pornography. because media is very inventfull. they have to invent situations everyday, so the people can watch, trying to get more realty. in media (and in pornography) its all about promising MORE reality.

surely peter knows the suffering. but. its the suffering, that the abuser imagine to happen right now before him in the head of the victim. and thats surely not whats happening. well, its difficult to say… never experienced something like that. and so the most readers of peter did. but inventing the victims head with all its content is another kind of pleasure. for some its the only one. thats why peters favourite writer is andrea dworkin. reporting from a victims point of view.
there is sure a question about who peter is. its the main question in the ps-community. cause the answer would delete all the other questions.

what can i say? being bored with everything is so boring… :) unless you have a reason to become a neo-de_sade on paper.

what's your shoot - who's the ps is?

idolizing? yes, perhaps. in my age its quite normal.
but peter is like a quest. you have to overcome him.
erase_*****

it wasn't a reproach, no way. it's a good choice for idolizing. just keep it in mind.

wouldn't you ask erase-someone for a professional opinion about the peter's traumas? she must have noticed something.

i'm enjoying the event so much. had never seen so much reality on the internet. i'm excited to see more. really. all the comments, comlaints… everybody has something to say. really great. look at wikipedia. they have everything on him, but still cant make a clue.
when will they understand its not about understanding?

spend the whole day reading everything i could find on cho seung-hui. media_addicted. and enjoying it ;)

you're a neo-ps, while ps is a neo-de_sade

what it's all about then?

crisis of crises, eh?

btw, s.o.k.y.r.a. - for your eyes only
http://img49.imageshack.us/img49/9144/54615783fh8.jpg

beware of your head

haha! i nearly spoiled my pants.

danke shoen, meine kleine ;)

4 ст.
прикинь, в мене 88 витатуйовано на запясті під годинником))))